|

Products
all have basic quality standards to meet. Cars shouldn’t
break down. Food should be fresh. A wireless phone should have
clear sound and decent battery life. But none of these things
are what make consumers enthusiastic about products. The truly
good products, the ones that people come to crave, embrace
the intangible aspects of human nature. Customer responses
to products, environments, services aren’t
always rational and analytic. Instead, they are fraught with
emotional, sensory, ego, cultural, and symbolism issues that
are very important.
This idea is the basis of an unusual course that I teach
every winter called ME314: “Good Products, Bad Products.” As
an engineering class, it is unusual in that it does not involve
math. There are a lot of ways to use statistics and systems
analysis to improve product quality, but this class is meant
to instruct engineering students in design considerations
that cannot be so easily quantified: the humanity issues. An
engineer involved in bringing a new product into the world
who doesn’t believe in the importance of the human
aspects of the product and doesn’t have tools to contemplate
and discuss those will not be as successful as an engineer
who does.
Take a look at Jello. There isn’t much in it beyond
water, gelatin and flavoring, but what makes it so popular
is its sensory and emotional appeal. Jello has a distinctive
and pleasant texture, or “mouthfeel.” It also
is fun because of how it moves, or “jiggles.” These aspects of Jello were identified by Talia Brodecki, Mike Camacho, Joe Kirscher, Jonny Lin, and Jorge Marcos who were studying “senses” in relation to product quality in ME314 this past winter quarter.
Another interesting example is a new high-performance electric
car produced by a company near campus called Tesla Motors.
Tesla’s Roadster looks and behaves like a sports car
in that it accelerates rapidly, but it is also different
because its motor makes very little sound. Some avid motorists
won’t buy the car precisely because they want a car
that makes a powerful growl when it charges up the highway
onramp, but others will desire it exactly because it doesn’t
make a sound. The car’s silent power will set its drivers
apart. For all the things consumers must consider when buying
a car, it could be the Roadster’s lack of sound that
becomes the defining characteristic for many.
One of the most successful products lately has been Apple’s
iPod. There are a lot of digital music players and each of
them has a different ratio of features to price, but that
calculus is not the basis of the iPod’s runaway popularity.
More than makers of competing products, Apple has succeeded
in convincing consumers that their player offers them creative
personal freedom and therefore greater control over their
lives. Apple as a company, with its long-standing commitment
to mold-breaking industrial design, gives the iPod additional
cachet. There is an ego-related aspect to buying most Apple
products. They signal something about who you are — a
membership in an elite.
Cultural considerations heavily influence the appeal of
a product or service. Students in my class have found that
text messaging is wildly popular in India because it can
facilitate dating even when traditionally minded parents
try to discourage it. In Japan, meanwhile, text messaging
fits well within a culture where making noise in public is
often frowned upon. These examples of culturally appropriate products were presented by Lisa Asari, Parmita Dalal, Michael Wittenberg, Amy Wu, and Harry Zhong as part of their work in the class this past winter quarter.
Meanwhile, a good example of a product with a primarily
symbolic appeal is the diamond. Despite their marketing,
diamonds really aren’t all that rare. But because diamonds
have become symbols of love and commitment, they are truly
craved.
Engineering is less about technology than meeting human needs
(even if that need is simply for Jello). The engineers who
are most successful in making new products are the ones who
therefore keep the customers and users at the forefront of
their minds when they are making their calculations, measurements
and schematics. |
 |
 |