|
|
| Health in the
heavens: Alumnus leads NASA research on space biomedicine |
John Hines (MS 1975 EE) is quick to point
out what would seem to be incredibly obvious: that life on earth is accustomed
to being on earth. As the Small Spacecraft Division Deputy Chief and Astrobionics Integrated Program/Project Team Leader
at NASA’s Ames Center in Mountain View, Calif., Hines is in charge
of developing technologies and spacecraft for finding out what happens to life—most importantly human health—when
it leaves the earth’s familiar gravity and radiation shielding.
As NASA ponders new Moon and Mars missions, the prospect of humans visiting
space more often makes his studies of space biology a rather intriguing
pursuit.
|
| |
What are
some of the things your research is investigating? |
| |
Well, for many years now I’ve
been the lead for physiological and medical monitoring technology development,
where we’ve been developing wearable physiological measurement
systems, biomedical sensors, and data acquisition systems that could
be used by astronauts and flight crews. We’re now beginning to
see what type of monitoring systems we will need for human exploration
when we start doing the lunar missions and the future missions that the
agency is planning to do. Through my astrobionics activity, I manage
and supervise those efforts in support of the Johnson Space Center’s
human research program.
I also have been the project manager and director of the GeneSat project,
which is a program to develop miniaturized spacecraft in the 12-pound
range for monitoring biological parameters, genetic changes in model
organisms. These include e.coli, yeast and other small organisms
such as drosophila (a small fly) and c. elegans (a
small worm), plants, and so forth. We have developed the in situ analytical
equipment, the measurement system and the sample management system to
be able to monitor those in a small spacecraft without having to bring
the samples back. We’re able to prepare the sample, operate the
experiment and measure those genetic parameters in space and send the
data back by radio. We’ve developed the whole spacecraft and system
built around the Cubesat and Nanosat configurations. Some of that work
has arisen from, was pioneered by, and advanced by Professor Bob Twiggs
there at Stanford. So we flew that first mission, the GeneSat, this past
December after a 3–4 year development of the basic technology.
So that’s another big area we’re very proud of.
We’re now developing the next mission with the same form factor but
a different payload—yeast microbes in this case—to understand
the effect of antifungal drugs on biological specimens by taking them up,
exposing them to the antifungal drugs and seeing how long it takes them
to function, at what concentrations they function, and whether they function
at the same levels in space as they do on the ground. We intend to fly
that this coming December. |
 |
Why would being in
space make a difference in biology or in medicine? |
| |
Beyond the psychology effects
of being in confined spaces for long durations, some of the physiological
and biological things that are being found is that it appears that the
immune system can be suppressed in the microgravity environment. Essentially
we are creatures of a 1g environment. When you go to a different environment,
those stresses that our body has been conditioned to function with—the
pull of gravity— goes away, and it causes some changes. Normally
your body has to counteract gravity to pump blood back up to the heart
as it goes to the circulatory system. If you take that force of gravity
away, the body is still conditioned to push that fluid northward but
you don’t need to push that much. You also have gravitational stresses
down to the cellular level that the body is conditioned to respond to
that aren’t there. It has to learn a different response.
So some of the manifestations are that people in space feel dizzy, and
they don’t have to work as hard. It’s like not exercising
for a long period of time and you basically get somewhat deconditioned.
Meanwhile, you are subjected to other kinds of stresses while the immune
system is suppressed. For instance we are getting ready to go to the Moon
and as you get outside the Van Allen Belt, you may be exposed to higher
radiation levels. Then, for instance, your immune system is suppressed
and you are exposed to higher stresses. How you might respond and react
and counter those effects on the ground may not work as well or the same
in a space environment. |
 |
So do we know precisely why the immune
system is suppressed in space? |
| |
It’s the subject of lots of studies and quantitative measurements.
One of the reasons we are trying to get more granularity with these genetic
and molecular measurements is just to find out what kinds of things are
changed.
|
 |
On the GeneSat that went up in December,
what was on board? |
| |
We measured the effect of a single gene target on e.coli,
K12, a benign strain of the bacterium that has no adverse effects on
humans. We engineer the bacteria to have a green fluorescent protein
tag that will allow us to monitor for changes in that protein as a function
of changes in the gene it is attached to.
This was a technology demonstration to prove that we could do it. The
target was a gene that would glow brightly and one that would grow slowly
so depending on the conditions of the experiment we were able to make
sure that we were able to quantify the system and validate that our systems,
our detections ,our estimates and that our spacecraft were working properly. |
 |
You’ve worked with EE Professor
Greg Kovacs often, haven’t you? |
| |
Greg and I have been associates for many years. About 4 or 5 years
ago, he along with Dr. Tony Ricco and Dr. Judith Swain formerly of the
medical school, initiated the National Center for Space Biological Technologies
(NCSBT), which is a combination of resources and expertise for the electrical
engineering department and the medical school to assist NASA in looking
at both biological technologies such as those technologies we used in
GeneSat, and biomedical technologies and measurement technologies such
as those for physiological monitoring.
And so Tony Ricco is the director of (NCSBT), with Greg being the principal
investigator. Tony has also functioned for several years as our chief
technologist for Astrobionics here at NASA Ames to really focus the expertise
and support us in our activities.
The GeneSat and Cubesat system itself and our whole activity in this
small spacecraft arena really started with Greg and I talking at a meeting
of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. We had heard about
the work that Professor Twiggs was working on, and Greg was able to bring
us together and that really started our activity in 2001 and 2002. |
 |
Let’s go further back in time
and ask how you your college years led to all this. |
| |
During my undergraduate work at Tuskegee University in Alabama, I
became interested in biomedical engineering by being a technician at
the veterinary school. I was privileged to work in that lab where they
were doing open heart surgery, cardiovascular research, and developing
instruments and implantable sensors and bioinstruments for monitoring
cardiovascular function in horses. That exposure really set me on the
path of wanting to do things in bio-related technologies and bioengineering.
I came to Stanford in 1972 with the idea of pursuing that area. At that
time there was not a full major in bioengineering. Basically you enrolled
in the electrical engineering program and took courses in medicine and
engineering and designed your own program.
At that time I also worked at SRI International in the radio physics
lab, which exposed me to space research, and as part of working at SRI,
I was exposed to NASA. I was looking for a Masters project to work on,
which ended up to be a project related to Doppler blood flow measurement.
It made use of the radar in the physics lab that I was working in and
the courses I was taking in medicine and electronics at Stanford. It
all really came together well. NASA gave us a contract at SRI to evaluate
some of the types of radar equipment that could be applied to medical
monitoring. All of that arose because I was looking for a project for
my independent study masters project.
In the ‘70s I was in Air Force on an institutional delay program
pursuing graduate school and had multiple years as an Air Force officer
detailed here at NASA Ames where I managed the cardiovascular lab. That
built on the cardiovascular lab and the Doppler electronics experiences
I had throughout college. At that time as part of our cardiovascular work
we did implantable technologies and sensors for use in dogs as well as
rhesus monkeys. In 1983 we flew the first rhesus monkeys in space with
the Russians, using some of the sensors and technologies we had developed
in the laboratory. |
 |
That’s pretty interesting that
you were working with the Soviet Union right about when President Reagan
called it the ‘evil empire.’ |
| |
Those were interesting times. When they were having those saber rattlings,
some of these scientific programs were the only things going on that
the countries were doing together to show that there were still ways
to cooperate.
We went to Russia right after the Korean airliner was shot down. The
first time I went to Russia in 1980 was the week after President Carter
canceled U.S. participation in the Olympics.
We still have collaborative activities with the same Russian colleagues
and institutes that we worked with now that are still going on and have
continued all this time. |
 |
How else do NASA Ames and Stanford collaborate? |
| |
We were just over with the center director this week to meet with
the vice provost and dean of academic research to talk about work that
might be done with gravitational physics being able to use the same GeneSat-sized
platform to do some work with the Gravity Probe B team. We’ve begun
to talk with the bioengineering and Bio-X folks about eventual collaborations.
It’s just amazing having the proximity of the world class expertise
at Stanford and the world class space activities right here together.
It’s just a great opportunity to go forward in the future to do
big science in small packages.
We really want to expand on this both for the science and technology aspects
of the agency and our mission, but If we are sending people to the moon in
2025 and to Mars thereafter, it’s going to be not even the students
now but their kids that are part of this. How do we expand and maintain this
continuum to make these things happen. That’s something that I’m
really thrilled to be a part of and helping to enable. |
| |
|