 |
Alumni Profile
| |
| From the Cold War to the War on Terror, an engineering career of innovation |
Mechanical Engineer Minoru “Sam”
Araki (BS ’54, MS ’55) graduated from Stanford at a time when
the Cold War was rapidly heating up. He quickly found himself helping lead
a project to develop the nation’s first spy satellite, named Corona.
Ultimately the pioneering work he and his team did earned them the 2005
Charles Stark Draper prize from the National Academy of Engineering.
Araki recently granted Stanford Engineering an interview in which he describes
the engineering challenges of building an early satellite, his tenure as
president of Lockheed Missiles and Space, and his newest venture. He is
currently CEO and president of a homeland security company called ST Infonox. |
|
|
Tell us about the
Corona project. |
| |
Corona was started during the
very, very beginning of the Cold War and the emphasis on Corona was brought
about by the Russians’ launch of Sputnik. The U.S. had not been centered
around going into space. We were essentially caught flat-footed. As that
was occurring, one more thing that made Corona, a top secret project, even more
urgent was the shooting down of the U-2 [spy plane]. That eliminated our
ability to conduct photographic reconnaissance of the Soviet Union. Coupled
with those two events there was tremendous pressure put upon President Eisenhower
to undertake a crash program to regain the ability to do photographic reconnaissance. |
 |
How did you figure out how to
make this work? |
| |
Our team came from all different
walks of life and education. The problem that we were trusted with was a
problem that none of us had been formally trained to perform. I had a ME
background, which at Stanford was more in thermodynamics and fluid dynamics.
Lockheed bilt a green field plant in Sunnyvale and we started in Stanford Industrial Park. This approach encouraged innovation.
We developed a discipline of our own because we had to put together all
of the space physics knowledge that we could, [but] space physics was basically
unknown. I graduated at Stanford just three and a half years before I went
on the Corona project with a Masters and we had no program at all on space.
So we had to develop space as a discipline from a space physics point of
view as well as developing engineering methods and the program management
techniques. As a matter of fact, on every flight that we flew with Corona
we always flew scientific experiments alongside of the flight so that we
could learn more about radiation, zero "G," and learn more about how vacuum sublimation, radiation heat transfer, and zero "G" capillary action takes place and so on.
One of the key aspects we had to develop [during the Corona years] was how
to build a simulation model of everything we built and designed for space.
We built the simulation model and then when we built the satellite we did
so exactly to the simulation model … and verified that the hardware
that we built actually worked to that simulation model. We did this for
all discipline areas including structure, propulsion, electrical, attitude control, communication, command, control and sensor system RF and optical performance and so on. Every aspect of the satellite. We developed simulation
techniques and then we always developed a testing technique in the space
environment to be able to prove that we had built the right kind of system.
We developed that over the first 10 to 15 years of the project. We
started in 1960 with satellites that could only last one day, and in 15
years achieved satellites that had a 5 to10 year life.
When we started Corona all we had were slide rules and mechanical calculators.
The computers came in the early ‘60s. By the mid-60s we had developed
all the simulation tools and all of the computer automated test programs
to be able to design, build and test satellites. |
 |
How did your studies at Stanford help, if not
with the subject matter of the project? |
| |
Let me share something with you because I cherish my education at Stanford,
the mechanical engineering masters program. When I went to school,
Professors A. Louis London and William Kays were the thermodynamic professors at that time.
The thing that I cherish the most in the education program that they developed
was not the thermodynamic portion, it was the method by which you solve
problems. You always state the problem. You always state the assumptions.
You always state the method by which you are going to solve the problem
and you always have to come to a conclusion. We used that over and over
again in the Corona program because we first of all had to understand the
problem. Every time we had a failure, every time we ran a flight, we had
to understand the problem first and we had to always make some assumptions
because we never had complete knowledge of what happened.
[At first] we had no knowledge of how to simulate on the ground as we do
today. We had no environment test program to simulate space in a chamber.
We couldn’t run vibration tests, we couldn’t run acoustic tests,
and we couldn’t run vacuum tests. It didn’t exist. So we basically
built something and flew it just to learn if it is going to work or not.
When it didn’t work we had to really analyze why it failed, under
what condition it failed and what should be the corrective action. This
whole process we developed – a lot of it—was based on the kind
of discipline we learned from London and Kays. |
 |
What are you proudest of in your time as president
at Lockheed? |
| |
The last job I had before retirement was the merger of Lockheed and Martin
Marietta. That was in 1996. So I was the last president of Lockheed Missiles
and Space Company and I was the first president of Lockheed Martin Missiles and
Space.
Corona was by far a very important achievement because it was the first.
The second major achievement came about as a result of the fact that with
the development of computers and communications it became obvious that we
could develop an ability to go from space to a smart weapon – take
the information from sensor to shooter in near real time. That development
came into fruition and was tested in the Gulf War. The 1991Gulf War was the
first true information age warfare which totally changed the way we fight
wars. We were in the forefront of that. Our aircraft sister company built the F-117
stealth fighter, which carried smart weapons. Space information was coupled
with the stealth fighter with the smart weapon.
One more thing relative to the information age warfare was MILSTAR. MILSTAR
was another very key development that provided the first space intranet.
MILSTAR, with its space borne switchboard/router and relay became the DoD digital, secure backbone for global communication.
You could take any message from anywhere and reach another part of the globe without touching the ground.
|
 |
You like to say that you “failed”
retirement. What are you doing now that you are back at work? |
| |
When 9/11 occurred and we had this terrible terrorist attack, I having spent my whole career in national security programs, realized how vulnerable
we were. What I saw was that if we put our minds, our technical
talent, our program management talents and some money behind it with a national
need, like a 9/11, that we could come up with a national security system
for homeland security which is equally as good as what we
had for the Cold War.
I got very interested in that and at the same time a good friend of mine
asked me about starting a venture capital firm in homeland security. He
and I teamed up together and found this company called ST-Infonox. ST-Infonox
is a spin-off from a financial transaction platform built by Infonox, which does anti-fraud money transfers.
Fraud works just like terrorism. They are both "asymmetric" threats. With terrorism you never know where the
enemy is, where it is going to strike, how it is going to strike -- it's an unpredictable threat. For an
anti-fraud transaction system, you have to design a system which detects
threats, catches them before they happen, early enough to catch multiple
indicators, integrate those multiple inputs and come to a conclusion that
there is a threat in the making. That’s what this money transaction
system does. We are successfully applying this to homeland security. |
| |
|
September 2005
|
|
Last Modified: April 24 2008 01:12:24 PM |
|